• |

    Javad Khazaeli, JD ’02 Discusses His Work In Ferguson

    Javad Khazaeli, JD ’02, contributes to Chapter 2 of the In St. Louis project, which focuses on the fifth anniversary of the conflict in Ferguson, MO. The project is designed to explore — through the experiences, scholarship, work, and voices of St. Louisans — what it means to be in St. Louis today. It was developed…

  • Professor Dan Epps Discusses How to Save the Supreme Court

    During the July 30 Democratic presidential debate, candidate Pete Buttigieg renewed his calls to “depoliticize the Supreme Court with structural reform.” Buttigieg has previously endorsed a Supreme Court reform proposal offered by Daniel Epps, associate professor in the School of Law at Washington University in St. Louis. Epps’ article, “How to Save the Supreme Court,”…

  • Professor Greg Magarian Remembers Justice John Paul Stevens

    Constitutional law expert Greg Magarian, the Thomas and Karole Green Professor of Law at Washington University in St. Louis, served as a judicial clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens of the U.S. Supreme Court. He offers this remembrance of the former justice: “John Paul Stevens was one of the greatest justices who ever graced the…

  • WashU Expert: Latest Trump asylum change is illegal

    Attorney General William Barr announced July 15 a new Trump Administration plan, effective the next day, barring Central American immigrants from seeking asylum in the United States unless they seek it first in other Central American countries, a move that a Washington University in St. Louis immigration expert says “violates the clear language of the…

  • Faculty Scholarship: Teacher for the Nation by Daniel Epps

    Abstract In these brief remarks, delivered at the Hastings Law Journal’s Symposium on the Jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy, I discuss Justice Kennedy’s impact on American law. I reflect on the events that led to Justice Kennedy’s appointment to the Supreme Court and discuss his vision of the Justices as teachers for the nation and how…

  • Faculty Scholarship: Holmes, Humility, and How Not to Kill Each Other by John Inazu

    Abstract Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissent in Abrams v. United States is one of the intellectual anchors of modern First Amendment doctrine. In that opinion, Holmes sets out two core aspects of his free speech jurisprudence: his pragmatic concern about majoritarian control and his quasi-libertarian preference for the “competition of the market.” In the century…